ghanawatch
In a move that has sent shockwaves through Ghana’s political and legal landscapes, President John Dramani Mahama has removed Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo from office. This decision, announced on September 1, 2025, marks the first time in Ghana’s history that a sitting Chief Justice has been investigated and subsequently dismissed. The removal comes on the heels of a constitutional inquiry that found grounds for “stated misbehaviour,” a term enshrined in the country’s 1992 Constitution. As Ghana grapples with this unprecedented event, questions arise about judicial independence, political motivations, and the broader implications for the rule of law in one of Africa’s most stable democracies.
This blog post delves deep into the background, the allegations, the inquiry process, public reactions, and the potential ramifications of this historic decision. With President Mahama back in power following his victory in the December 2024 presidential elections, where he secured a decisive win over Vice President Mahamudu Bawumia of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), this action underscores the shifting dynamics in Ghanaian politics. Mahama, a member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), assumed office in January 2025, promising accountability and reform. But critics argue this removal smacks of retribution, especially given Torkornoo’s appointment by Mahama’s predecessor, Nana Akufo-Addo of the NPP.
Background: Who is Gertrude Torkornoo and How Did We Get Here?
Gertrude Torkornoo, born in 1962, is a seasoned jurist with a distinguished career in Ghana’s judiciary. She was nominated as Chief Justice in April 2023 by then-President Nana Akufo-Addo and confirmed by Parliament in June of that year, becoming the third female to hold the position after Georgina Wood and Sophia Akuffo. Her tenure was marked by efforts to modernize the judiciary, including digitization initiatives and addressing case backlogs. However, it was also fraught with controversies, including accusations of bias in high-profile cases involving political figures.
Torkornoo’s troubles began intensifying after the 2024 elections, which saw John Mahama return to the presidency after his previous term from 2012 to 2017. The elections were a referendum on the Akufo-Addo administration’s handling of economic issues, corruption scandals, and governance. Mahama’s NDC campaigned on a platform of “resetting” the country, including purging institutions perceived as corrupted or politically aligned with the outgoing NPP government. The judiciary, often seen as a battleground in Ghanaian politics, became a focal point.
In March 2025, just months into Mahama’s new term, a petition was filed by Daniel Ofori, a Ghanaian citizen, calling for Torkornoo’s removal on grounds of misconduct and misbehaviour. This was one of three petitions against her, but Ofori’s was the first to be fully investigated. The petition invoked Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution, which outlines the procedure for removing superior court justices, including the Chief Justice. Under this article, removal can only occur for stated misbehaviour, incapacity, or incompetence, and it requires a presidential inquiry.
Article 146 is a cornerstone of Ghana’s constitutional framework, designed to protect judicial independence while ensuring accountability. It stipulates that for the Chief Justice’s removal, the President, in consultation with the Council of State, appoints a committee comprising two Supreme Court justices (one as chair) and three non-legal experts. The committee investigates the petition and submits a report, which the President must follow if it recommends removal. This process echoes the removal of former Electoral Commission Chair Charlotte Osei in 2018 under Akufo-Addo, which many saw as politically motivated.
Torkornoo had faced scrutiny before. During Akufo-Addo’s tenure, a 2023 petition against her was dismissed due to procedural deficiencies. However, with the change in government, the new administration appeared more willing to pursue such complaints. In April 2025, Mahama suspended Torkornoo pending the inquiry and appointed Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie as acting Chief Justice. Torkornoo rejected the allegations, calling them “unfounded and politically motivated”.
The Allegations: Breaking Down the Charges
The core of the case against Torkornoo rested on three main allegations detailed in Ofori’s petition, all deemed to constitute “stated misbehaviour” under Article 146(1).
First, unlawful expenditure of public funds. The petition accused Torkornoo of misusing judicial resources during personal travels in September 2023. Specifically, she allegedly took trips to Tanzania with her husband and to the United States with her daughter, claiming per diem allowances for family members. The committee viewed this as “avoidable and reckless dissipation of public funds,” especially egregious for the head of the judiciary tasked with safeguarding public resources. In Ghana, where corruption perceptions remain high, such actions fuel public distrust in institutions.
Second, a constitutional breach in staff transfers. Torkornoo was accused of violating Article 295(a) and (b) of the Constitution by improperly transferring Mr. Baiden, a Judicial Service staff member. The details suggest this transfer was done without due process, potentially for personal or vindictive reasons. The committee found this amounted to misbehaviour, highlighting a disregard for constitutional norms.
Third, interference in judicial appointments. Perhaps the most politically charged allegation: Torkornoo allegedly bypassed established procedures by requesting Akufo-Addo to appoint additional Supreme Court justices and even providing names. This contravened case law from the Ghana Bar Association, which sets out nomination processes. Critics argue this was an attempt to pack the court with allies, a tactic seen in other democracies but rare in Ghana.
These allegations, while seemingly administrative, paint a picture of a Chief Justice who overstepped boundaries, blending personal interests with public duties.
The Inquiry Process: A Thorough Examination
The five-member committee, chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gabriel Scott Pwamang, was appointed in April 2025. Other members included Justice Samuel Kwame Adibu-Asiedu, anti-corruption crusader Daniel Yaw Domelevo, Major Flora Bazaanura Dalugo, and Professor James Sefah Dzisah. Domelevo’s inclusion, as a former Auditor-General known for his anti-corruption stance, added credibility but also raised eyebrows given his past clashes with the Akufo-Addo government.
The inquiry was exhaustive: 13 witnesses testified for the petitioner, reviewing over 10,000 pages of evidence. Torkornoo defended herself, calling 12 witnesses, including experts. Despite legal challenges to the process, including lawsuits by the opposition NPP deeming it a “witch hunt,” the committee proceeded. On September 1, 2025, it submitted its report, concluding that misbehaviour was established and recommending removal.
President Mahama acted swiftly, signing the removal order the same day. In a statement signed by Minister Felix Kwakye Ofosu, the presidency emphasized adherence to constitutional obligations.
Public and Political Reactions: A Divided Nation
The removal has elicited sharp divisions. On X (formerly Twitter), reactions poured in immediately. Citi FM broke the news with posts like “Chief Justice Torkornoo removed,” garnering thousands of views and mixed responses. Supporters of the NDC celebrated, viewing it as accountability. One user, @KSnetne, noted that Torkornoo would forfeit pensions and perks, praising Mahama for following due process. Another, @Garlingos, drew parallels to Charlotte Osei’s removal, calling it a “you do me, I do you” scenario between NPP and NDC.
Critics, particularly from the NPP, decried it as political vengeance. The opposition condemned the suspension in April as an attack on judicial independence. Legal expert Alfred Tuah-Yeboah called it a “dangerous precedent,” warning it could erode judicial tenure. University of Ghana lecturer praised it as Mahama’s “biggest achievement,” while others, like @realBrakopowers, questioned the legality in viral videos.
Media outlets amplified the debate. BBC Africa reported it as a historic firing, while local sites like MyJoyOnline and Graphic Online provided detailed breakdowns. Some X users shared cryptic posts, like Daniel Domelevo’s hinting at the outcome.
Implications: Judicial Independence vs. Political Interference
This event raises profound questions. On one hand, it reinforces accountability: no one, not even the Chief Justice, is above the law. The allegations, if true, highlight ethical lapses that undermine public trust. Mahama’s administration argues it strengthens institutions by weeding out misconduct.
On the other, it risks politicizing the judiciary. Ghana’s history of alternating NDC-NPP governments has seen institutions weaponized against opponents. Torkornoo’s appointment by Akufo-Addo and removal by Mahama fuels perceptions of revenge. As MyJoyOnline opined, while constitutionally valid, it must pass the “legitimacy test” in citizens’ eyes. Lowering the bar for removal could deter qualified judges from serving, fearing political reprisals.
Broader implications include potential court packing or reforms. With two other petitions pending, more shake-ups may follow. For Ghana’s democracy, rated highly in Africa, this tests the balance between executive power and judicial autonomy.
Internationally, it draws comparisons to judicial crises in places like Poland or the US, where court independence is contested. Yet, Ghana’s adherence to constitutional processes sets it apart, potentially as a model for accountability.
Conclusion: A New Chapter for Ghana’s Judiciary
The removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo is more than a personnel change; it’s a pivotal moment that could redefine Ghana’s judicial landscape. While substantiated by inquiry findings, it underscores the perils of politicized justice. As Mahama’s government moves forward, appointing a new Chief Justice will be crucial to restoring confidence. For Ghanaians, this saga reminds us that true democracy demands vigilance against abuse of power, regardless of party lines. Whether this bolsters or erodes the rule of law remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Ghana’s judiciary is at a crossroads.
About The Author
Discover more from Ghana Watch
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
